Eight ways your balanced scorecard should be helping you in the economic climate (Part 2)

Eight ways your balanced scorecard should be helping you in the economic climate (Part 2)

This article provides four more ways that a good balanced scorecard should be helping you. It also includes a checklist you can action immediately.

In the last article I explained four ways in which your balanced scorecard should be helping you in the current economic climate. This is by:

1) Supporting governance and decision making
2) Knowing what drives costs and revenues for better decision making
3) Helping you to focus on the right investments
4) Helping you find more suitable measures as the situation changes

This article covers four more ways:

5) Providing advanced warning of internal problems and change
6) Provide advance warning of external change
7) Communicating priorities so they are clear
8) Evolving as your strategy changes and you adjust to the economic climate

Let us cover these four in sequence:

5) Providing advanced warning of internal problems and change

Your balanced scorecard should act as an early warning system for you. Within your scorecard lead and lag measures should be telling you whether your strategy is still on course or whether things are going wrong with your strategy.

One client used this to identify projects that were off track. Another looked for regions that were missing opportunities compared with other similar regions. A third ensured the capabilities were being developed and the organisation’s values continued to be adhered to.

It is too late if your measures simply tell you that things have gone wrong. To operate properly these lead and lag measures should exist within objectives and between perspectives. To design these you need an explicit cause and effect model in your strategy map and scorecard. Omit that cause and effect model, and you may be missing out on signals that things are going wrong.

6) Provide advance warning of external change

As you built your strategy map you would have made a note o the assumptions about the market. Also about those trigger signals that would suggest when your strategy might need to be revised. For instance did you assume a particular oil price level, cost of money or level of sales. When you have trigger signals built into your strategy map and scorecard you are monitoring the external environment for warnings that things might change.

7) Communicating priorities so they are clear

The advantage of communicating both objectives AND measures is that you make it clear what matters and people can clearly understand it, even when the measures become redundant.

When people know what is important (as well as how you are trying to measure it) they can help you achieve it. Also the combination of objectives helps explains tensions and conflicts. When you are trying to reduce costs and also protect revenues, you have to balance the tensions of costs reduction whilst maintaining the focus on revenues. It is not either/or. It is both.

8) Evolving as your strategy changes and you adjust to the economic climate

Your strategy may have evolved over the last few months. I have one client who has recently chosen to focus on the next 9-12 months, to position them for the future. In another client they are taking the chance the economy provides to build longer term capability. Another is ensuring it has a sound base of information on the business, and focusing on professionalism to provide assurance of delivery and to reduce costs.

One of the biggest problems you may find with your measurement system is that many measures become less informative over time: Especially when the environment is changing. In contrast, the strategy map and its objectives, describes the strategy. When the strategy needs revising you can revise the capabilities in the learning and growth areas, you can adjust the process objectives, you can refine customer needs and revisit the financial objectives. You could even add a new theme.

Then the balanced scorecard underneath the strategy map can be re-visited and re-designed or updated to reflect the new strategic imperatives. It’s a lot easier than revising the whole strategic plan. It is far better than leaving outdated measures in place. You might even save some money by removing the redundant ones. You will be able to communicate the revised imperatives, direction and how your staff can help.

So what now?

Go through the eight ways in which your balanced scorecard should be helping you. Do a simple appraisal:

1) In the current climate, is our balanced scorecard helping us in each of these aspects

2) What are the gaps?

3) What do we need to change?

4) How quickly do we need to make these improvements?

5) What help do we need?

You’ll find advice and resources on the excitant website, and when you need to make progress quickly, simply give me a call.

Phil Jones
For balanced scorecards that implement strategy
http://www.excitant.co.uk/

Balanced Scorecards in uncertainty and recession (Part 1)

How your balanced scorecard should be helping you in this economic climate (part 1)

The current environment is an excellent test of your balanced scorecard. Does it still serve you well as the economy changes, with credit tightening, interest rate and exchange rate changes, with concerns over governance (just ask a banker), as you need to find ways to change costs, or as you seek ways to maintain existing revenues or find new ones?

There are ways of doing well in this environment? Given all the doom and gloom in the car industry I have a friend in the trade who has never been busier. Why? He is exporting UK cars to people who are finding the pound so cheap that it is worth buying cars here. In every cloud, as they say. Of course it’s a change of strategy but you do have to spot opportunities and grasp them and youir balanced scorecard should be helping you. Here’s how:

1) Supporting governance and decision making

The first thing that your balanced scorecard should do is provide your board and your management with good quality governance and assurance. To do this it needs to provide a clear overview of performance across the balanced scorecard’s perspectives (Financial, customer, process & learning & growth). The relationships between perspectives provide lead and lag indicators of success so you know you are staying on track or something is going wrong that will lead you off track. You have the ability to drill into detail as you need it. The well presented information should promote and encourage informed discussion, backed up with evidence. Overall this should provide your board with information they can trust so they understand the risks, can act with confidence, or be assured that things are in control.

2) Knowing what drives costs and revenues for better decision making

If you are going to make decisions about costs and revenues you have to be clear what drives them. Your balanced scorecard’s cause and effect model that crosses the perspectives should be telling you what drives costs and what drives customer behaviour and revenue. If it isn’t, particularly if you have measures in perspectives that don’t have any relations between perspectives, you won’t be able to make informed decisions about which levers to pull to change costs of revenues. You might cut costs that undermine quality or sales.

As an example, some colleagues of mine have recently been using lean management practices to eliminate waste from processes and activities. The lean principles map well onto the cause and effect model of the balanced scorecard. In one case (from financial services) they identified savings of £300,000 per annum, in just one department. This was in an organisation with a total operating costs of only £11m. That is nearly 3% improvement in profits. In another example (from the public sector) a customer’s application took 3 months and travelled 1.5 miles to get processed. This was reduced to 45 minutes and 1 yard. You can imagine how this improved both services and costs. In each case it is the underlying capabilities that drive processes, to serve customers and deliver revenues, economically: that is the cause and effect model of the balanced scorecard.

3) Focusing on the right investments, Eliminating the wrong ones

One danger at the moment is across the board cuts. Perhaps cuts to discretionary spend or perhaps 10% across the board in every department. Of course some costs, such as rent or IT system costs, are fixed and indirect. They are hard to cut. Others, like training, marketing and even wages, are easier to cut. However these might not be the right things to cut, they get cut disproportionately because they are softer targets and the internal dictate dominates the logic of business performance.

In one organisation we worked through their projects aligning them to their strategy map. From a total project spend of £100m we found £40 that were not directly contributing to their strategy. That is potentially a £40m saving. In another organisation the simple process of exposing their project portfolio (over 130 projects in an organisation with a cost base of only £150m) and allowing that portfolio to be seen as a whole, provided the management team with the incentive to get a better grip on project approval, project costs overrun and, most importantly, the delivery of promised benefits.

4) Refining measures, whilst maintaining objectives

Modern balanced scorecards don’t start with measures. They start with objectives. This means you know what you want to achieve and the characteristics of the objective help you to tell what you should be measuring.

When things change, and some measures have become inappropriate you don’t just want to add more measures, do you. That will add cost as well. When your approach is anchored in objectives, it is far easier to refine your measures, and targets, whilst still communicating your overall objective. Your balanced scorecard should be able to adapt like this.

Only four tips today: There will be some more in a week or so time. While you are asking these questions you might just wonder how out of date or “modern” your balanced scorecard is. To read about how the approach introduced some vital and fundamental developments between 1992 and 1994, have a read of my new article, “What really makes a balanced scorecard balanced?”.

I hope your balanced scorecard is as least as good as those from 1995?

Phil Jones

Strategic Balanced Scorecard Specialists
Excitant Ltd